links

Design for Asia Awards 2007 - Business Week has a photo set of the winning entries. I would have given it to the camera, about which they write “It evokes the days when cameras lasted a generation with its retro look and feel”.


Chinese Kids Get Foreign Toys - Time magazine has an article on an interesting trend. In my house it has been a long standing battle against collecting more and more cheap Chinese plastic toys. We last bought a Chinese toy probably in early spring.

About a month ago, I googled Lego to find out where they are manufactured. Jaxon will soon be happy to learn they are made in Denmark and Czech Republic, and decorated in Denmark, Czech Republic, Mexico and the US.


Race and IQ, cont. - More Malcom Gladwell on genetics and IQ. A good one page summary of the 4 page article I linked to.

foreign affairs & ideas & links & photos posted by: dan  @  14 Dec 2007 23:58 | Comments (0)

links

Why Blog - A video by Steven Levitt of Freakonomics fame and a Professor of Economics at University of Chicago. This short video is part of the Freakonomics blog being absorbed by the NYTimes. This video and Levitt’s post titled “If You Were a Terrorist, How Would You Attack?” are interesting examples of the interaction between new and old media. Levitt writes an Opinions piece centered on eliciting user ideas in the comments and posts a home-made video on the pages of the New York Times. Also Terrorism, Part II.


Storytelling - A video interview with Ira Glass from the radio and TV show This American Life about the art of telling stories for radio or video broadcast. Tim O’Reilly’s Radar has a good synopsis.

The Book Business - This is an interesting exchange of letters between the largest bookstore chain in Australia and the CEO of one of their suppliers at a not-so-big publishing house. In essence, the bookstore wants the publisher to pay for shelf-space. The publisher is not so keen on that idea. Booksellers and publishers are on the long list of industries with major issues to work out as they’re dragged into the digital millennium.

The 150 Top Media and Marketing Blogs - According to Adertising Age. Lots of links.

links posted by: dan  @  09 Aug 2007 21:35 | Comments (0)

links

Who’s Minding the Mind - An interesting article from the New York Times about the role our subconscious plays in decision-making. The article reminded me of Malcolm Gladwell’s book Blink (excepted at that link) in which he describes these instantaneous and imperceptible decisions across a range of scenarios.


Craigslist as Business Model - The interview in the preceding link is Craigslist’s CEO Jim Buckmaster answering reader submitted questions. You may read it and think “Another CEO that knows what his customers wants to hear”. But if you watch this interview with Craig Newmark (the Craig of craigslist) on Charlie Rose, you’ll see a non-cynical business leader that pretty convincingly believes what he says. As part of the discussion, Craig Newmark has some interesting commentary on craigslist’s suspected effect on the shrinking newspaper business.

I admire the way Craigslist is managed, not guided solely by financial considerations, but also by what makes it’s principal owner happy or proud. CL is an advertising site that doesn’t blind you with unrelated ads, it is a user-based content site that removes content only on user-suggestion and even then relatively rarely, and it is an online marketplace not interested in (a cut of) the financial transaction. The space for online advertising sites may be full, but the business strategy behind craigslist seems rewarding and endlessly renewable.

links posted by: dan  @  02 Aug 2007 9:47 | Comments (0)

Open Medicine

Open Medicine is an open-access peer-reviewed web-based medical journal that launched today. I’m working in the field of open-access online medical publishing and I’m glad I’m not alone in thinking the world needs more efforts like this. Read the lead editorial for an excellent analysis, excerpted below:

Medical knowledge should be public and free from undeclared influence. When possible, it should be free for those who apply it. Since people’s lives depend on it, that knowledge must be filtered several times before it is ready to use. Studies need to be peer reviewed, to have their statistics analyzed, their content edited, then copy edited, then published quickly for as wide an audience as possible. The prospect of having a high-quality source of information that held true to these principles but was also free and globally accessible was impossible to imagine 20 years ago. Paper and postage are simply too expensive. The landscape is different today. An ideal medical journal — a truly open one — is not only within our sight, it is within our reach….

Open Medicine is a new general medical journal. It will be paperless and available without charge or any other barrier to access online. We will publish peer-reviewed science and analysis as well as clinical articles. We will provide a forum for informed and inclusive debates on medicine and its application. Open Medicine will be independent of any commercial publisher or association ownership — it will be “owned” by all who read and contribute to it — and will take no advertisements from companies selling pharmaceuticals or medical devices. We will rely on voluntarism, donations and ethical advertising. Any revenue will be used to improve our ability to meet the needs of our readers and contributors.

There are so many reasons why this type of development is important. Easy access to newly acquired knowledge for doctors in poorer nations and at your local non-university-affiliated health-center, as well as sources for good information for patients, would likely lead to improved clinical results across a broad spectrum of patients and is long overdue. With the New England Journal of Medicine and most other journals filled with pharmaceutical and medical device advertisements, it may become increasingly beneficial to have someone watching the watchers. The article Direct-to-consumer advertising and expenditures on prescription drugs: a comparison of experiences in the United States and Canada is a good example of useful knowledge for many people that don’t have access to paid subscription journals. This is an interesting study with useful data for policy analysts, advertising analysts and regulators, sociologists, and casual interested readers like me.

Given just those problems, gradual reform might be more likely than a revolution in journal publishing. Everyone with a real interest could go to a library, get a poverty discount, or pay $20 for a copy of a NEJM article. But an equally important issue is that authors want to be read, researchers want to be influential, and doctors want to improve our health care. Authors write journal articles for professional prestige, there may be compensation for the study which forms the basis of an article, but that is seldom the case for writing and editing a journal article or textbook chapter. When an author’s work is accepted for publication, the publishing companies acquire copyright and lock-up the unpaid contribution behind fees and memberships. With Open Medicine, authors will retain copyright while being provided a distribution medium. Between donating control of your hard work for someone else to make a profit and loaning an extra copy of your work to all interested parties, one model has a clear advantage over the other in the long term. One day soon, academic journal publishers will confront the same dilemma faced earlier by newspapers: either make most of their content openly accessible online or become obsolete. NEJM may be medicine’s WSJ, but change is certainly coming.

The author of the editorial is working for Médecins San Frontière in Sudan and has an interesting
blog.

ideas & links posted by: dan  @  18 Apr 2007 19:24 | Comments (0)

links

The Art of the Start Video - Guy Kawasaki, a venture capitalist and author, gave this good talk on business and entrepreneurship. It is 40 minutes long but it is an interesting look at the VC-backed tech company phenomenon.

Doc Searls had some interesting thoughts on an ongoing discussion of how to save newspapers. Berkman Center for Internet and Society blogs>

George Orwell’s 6 rules for written English in “Politics and the English Language”.

i. Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print.
ii. Never use a long word where a short one will do.
iii. If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out.
iv. Never use the passive where you can use the active.
v. Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent.
vi. Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous.

ideas & links posted by: dan  @  26 Mar 2007 22:04 | Comments (0)

Newsvine

Newsvine.org - This is an interesting idea and a good site site to browse.

This is why ideas like above are so interesting:
In Silicon Valley, the Race Is On to Trump Google

The money quote:

“You don’t need to be No. 1 to be worth
billions of dollars,” said Allen Morgan,
a partner at Mayfield Fund, a venture capital
firm…

Tagged:

ideas & links & technology posted by: dan  @  01 Jan 2007 20:52 | Comments (0)

Next Page »